How to Pick Vintage Styles

April 26, 2009 at 4:10 pm (Uncategorized)

I frequently get questions about how to make the plus sized figure look good in vintage styles.  There is no single answer, so I thought discussing this topic in a blog post might be helpful.

The first thing to picking the right vintage style is to know your figure type.  This is very important to all sizes, but critical for the plus-sized gal.  Different decades had different ideal body types.  If you match your body type to that decade, you will look your best.  If, however, you are into historical reenactment or have just fallen in love with a particular style, there are ways to make things fit.  I’ll discuss that later.

1930’s

The 1930’s started out being influenced by the 1920’s, with hip-hugging skirts and ruffles and bows to draw the eye upward.  This decade looks great on the more rectangular figure, meaning not much difference between the waist and hips. As decade progresses, we see more curves leading into wartime fashion, with full sleeves and A-line skirts.

1940’s

The 1940’s were governed by WWII rationing and fabric restrictions.  We see built-up shoulders and A-line skirts.  The rectangular figure is given the illusion of a waist and the pear figure is given balance by the built-up shoulder.  As the decade progresses, we move into Dior’s New Look that dominates the next decade.

1950’s

The 1950’s are dominated by Dior’s New Look, featuring a full skirt and smaller shoulders.  At this time, we also see the slim line, also know as wiggle dresses.  The New Look fits the hourglass figure well.  The cinched waists follows the hourglass curves.  The inverted triangle, heavy on top, slim hips and bum, is given the appearance of balance by the full skirt.

1960’s

The 1960’s starts off with 1950’s influences.  The skirt rises to just below the knee and the waist is not as tight as the 50’s.  Great if you have nice legs or your waist isn’t as defined as a classic hourglass.  The mid 60’s develops into the classic Jackie O look, the Chanel Suit.  The more boxy look, with it’s shift dresses and cardigan jackets, suits the rectangular and apple figures well.

Of course, these are the ideal figure types.  If you are doing historical reenactment or are attached to a particular era, there are ways around the ideal.  The first major thing would be proper undergarments.  These fashions were designed for a figure wearing girdles and bras of the era.  A proper girdle will help the hourglass or apple slim the hips for 1930’s looks.  The proper waist cincher will help give more of defined waist for the 1950’s look.  If you choose to forgo proper undergarments, then changes must be made to the pattern prior to cutting.  If you don’t have a defined waist, the New Look styles must be made bigger at the waist.  If you aren’t full busted, the 1950’s styles might need a small bust adjustment.  If you are an hourglass wanting to wear wartime fashions, a full bust adjustment must be made and the waist taken in.  I’m not saying that you can’t go against type, just that more work must be done in order to look your best.  The beauty of using vintage patterns today, is that we can pick what we like or what suits us from all eras.  Have fun!

Th

Permalink 2 Comments

Simplicity 1373

April 23, 2009 at 5:08 pm (dresses)

I fell in love with the pattern the minute I laid eyes on it.  The scooped waist seam is an interesting detail I hadn’t seen before.  The option of long sleeves is appealing, as I don’t have many long sleeved patterns.  The princess seamed bodice is something I hadn’t tried on vintage patterns before. So many new details to try!

The first step was to grade up.  The original pattern is sized to fit a 32 bust, 26 waist and 35 hip.  After my first muslin was completed, it should that the waist needed to be lowered an inch.  Those were the only alterations needed to the bodice.  To the skirt, I took a 1in fold in length, then cut 4in off the finished hem length.  I’m not quite as happy with the finished product as I was with the bodice before the skirt went on.  The heavy skirt pulls the bodice down, so it doesn’t quite fit as nicely as without the skirt, but it’s still a pretty dress.

Here is a close-up of the fabric.  I LOVE this fabric!

Permalink 8 Comments

Pattern sale

April 21, 2009 at 4:44 pm (Uncategorized)

I have decided to sell off some of my vintage pattern collection.  These patterns are all styles that I fell in love with, but for some reason or other, just don’t suit me.  I LOVE suits, but just don’t wear them.  I love  great big collars, but they do nothing for a top-heavy figure.  I’ve made a flickr set of my pattern for sale.  They will be $5 each or 4 for $18 via paypal, shipping is free within the US.  If you’re interested, leave me a comment.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/12275674@N08/sets/72157617044503561/

Permalink 7 Comments

It’s been a while.

April 19, 2009 at 3:27 pm (Uncategorized)

I know it’s been a while since I’ve posted here, thought I needed a quick update.  So far, the SWAP is not going as planned.  I have a sizeable chunck of my SWAP done, but am finding that I just am not wearing the pieces.  The reality is that I love pretty dresses!  When not in a pretty dress, I prefer jeans and t-shirts.  The skirt and blouse combos make me feel frumpy with a side order of being too dressed up for things like cleaning, gardening, ect.  At this point, I feel like it was a waste of time and money.  I have some fabric leftover but I’m not sure what I’m going to do with it.

Permalink 2 Comments